GuitarDiscussion.com Forum Index GuitarDiscussion.com
Christian Guitar Forum
 

 FAQFAQ SearchSearch Free GamesMake a Donation  UsergroupsUsergroups Free GamesForum Rules ProfileContact RegisterRegister 
ProfileWebsite News Log inSubmit Articles  ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in 


Presidental canidates...


Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    GuitarDiscussion.com Forum Index -> CHRISTIAN GUITAR LOUNGE
Author Message
sharring
Tiger



Joined: 04 Feb 2004

Posts: 815

Location: Texas

PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 5:39 am    Post subject: Presidental canidates... Reply with quote

Has anyone been paying attention to the primary polls in Iowa? Huckabee came out of nowhere to take a big lead on the Republican side. Newsweek did a cover story on him this week. Seems he's an ordained Southern Baptist minister as well as a bass player. What's not to like?
Back to top
Bates15
Moderator



Joined: 19 Feb 2002

Posts: 1084


PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 9:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

As important to world matters as it is, I missed about evrything about the canidates this time.... Any one we should beware of?
Back to top
jeff_osu
Tiger



Joined: 17 Sep 2003

Posts: 839

Location: Oklahoma

PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 9:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm hoping Fred Thompson gets the nod.
Back to top
J Dan Brown
Kitten



Joined: 18 Nov 2007
Posts: 147

Location: Elm Grove, LA

PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 2:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Huckabee has been my wife, Sheila's and my favorite,, up until now. I think that his bold Christianity will frighten the average American like my singing at the VA, but what do I know? They tell me my brain occaisionally shorts out, and I have to believe them, 'cause why would they lie, whether I remember or not? Confused
Blessed, with enormous bounty, Dan
Back to top
PunkStar
Moderator



Joined: 27 Sep 2003

Posts: 1186

Location: Wodonga, Australia

PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 11:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here in Aus, the only thing we hear about the US election is Hilary and Obama. But then, we have more recently been concerned with choosing our own new government (I haven't decided whether it's a good thing or not).

So I'll agree with Nate, anything we need to know?
Back to top
sharring
Tiger



Joined: 04 Feb 2004

Posts: 815

Location: Texas

PostPosted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 1:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nate and Punk-Since i've been leaning toward the Republican philosophy for the last ten years i have a hard time with Hillary's support of gay rights and pro-life (favoring abortion) platform. Although Obama shares the same platform, i find his reasoning on his beliefs easier to follow and well thought out, even though i don't agree with them. Also Hillary is a government insider whereas Obama is a newcomer-they say a new broom sweeps clean right?
Back to top
PunkStar
Moderator



Joined: 27 Sep 2003

Posts: 1186

Location: Wodonga, Australia

PostPosted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 1:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

sharring wrote:
-they say a new broom sweeps clean right?


I'll tell you after Kevin Rudd has had a few more months. Wink
Back to top
George E
Big Hamster



Joined: 29 Jul 2007
Posts: 93

Location: Pittsburgh

PostPosted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 8:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

J Dan Brown wrote:
I think that his bold Christianity will frighten the average American


It frightens me. Within the Christian Church there are some differences in theological interpretation. Most Christians can accept the fact that not every Christian is guided to the exact same understanding of the Bible. But there are a minority of Christians who seem to think they have a monopoly on understanding, and that they are entitled to speak on behalf of all Christians with the one and only official Christian position on any issue.

I have a problem when the person claiming to speak on behalf of all Christians lives in Rome, and I have just as big a problem when the person acting as if he is the only source of God's revealed truth lives in Virginia Beach, Falls Church, or any other city.
Back to top
sharring
Tiger



Joined: 04 Feb 2004

Posts: 815

Location: Texas

PostPosted: Wed Dec 26, 2007 8:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

So can someone give an example of his boldness that frightens? I admit i havent followed as closely as i would like-hence the reason for this discussion. As far a theological differences George E, the Bible has solved most of my dilemmas regarding doctrine. It seems pretty straightforward on most things. And Huckabee's not running for pope. But i like knowing some of the candidate's principles.
Back to top
George E
Big Hamster



Joined: 29 Jul 2007
Posts: 93

Location: Pittsburgh

PostPosted: Wed Dec 26, 2007 2:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

sharring wrote:
So can someone give an example of his boldness that frightens? I admit i havent followed as closely as i would like-hence the reason for this discussion. As far a theological differences George E, the Bible has solved most of my dilemmas regarding doctrine. It seems pretty straightforward on most things. And Huckabee's not running for pope. But i like knowing some of the candidate's principles.


I wasn't referring to specific things he has said. I was referring to my confidence that if he became President and some new, unforeseen problem arose that his judgement on how to deal with it might be driven by certain preconceived ideas. In particular, I have a problem with anyone who I suspect might want to use the power and authority of the government to enforce their perceptions of God's laws. I don't want a Muslim government to tell me that I must follow Sharia law. And I don't want a Christian government run by by people whose interpretation of Christianity are at severe disagreement with mine.

There are things that are sins that should not be made illegal. It is a sin to covet another's spouse or property. That doesn't mean that coveting should be made illegal. It is a sin to take the Lord's name in vain (such as printing it on mammon, but that's another discussion). That doesn't mean it should be a crime. We don't need police to arrest and jail blasphemers. I have known far too many "bold Christians" who do seek to make all sins into crimes. It is that attitude that I fear.

Some Christians believe consuming alcoholic beverages is a sin. Fine. They shouldn't be forced to drink alcohol if they don't want to. But we saw what happened when it was made illegal.

I think one of the best things to happen to Christianity in America was the First Amendment's separation of church and state. Though that exact phrase is not in the Constitution, there is no better or more succinct summary of the net effect of the combined anti-establishment and free exercise clauses. I do wish more people understood that the separation also means the separation of state and church. It means that the state cannot dictate what I say from the pulpit. It means the state must not meddle in or interfere in the actions of the church.

As for Huckabee's principles, those can only be known from his actions, not from his rhetoric. Given that my state's Primary election is several months away, I haven't made up my mind yet. I'm still gathering information. The only thing that I am sure of is that I'll do anything within my power to help ensure that Hilary Clinton does not become the next President.
Back to top
sharring
Tiger



Joined: 04 Feb 2004

Posts: 815

Location: Texas

PostPosted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 11:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

All people are driven by preconcieved ideas Geroge E. That's why Huckabees "bold" Christianity is important. He knows and accepts that he will be held to a higher standard by believers and will be a witness (good or bad) to non-believers. As far as presidents who use the power of government to enforce their preceptions of God's law, isn't that exactly what George Bush did when he vetoed stem cell research?I dare say every president since George Washington is guilty of this. Are you against the power of the office or are you against decisions made on specific issues you don't agree with? And how do you know that his interpretation of Christianity is so different than yours? You must know his pretty well to make such a statement. Perhaps you would like to share?
Back to top
markm2553
Moderator



Joined: 03 Feb 2003

Posts: 1014

Location: Marengo, IN USA

PostPosted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 7:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I guess I need to start paying a little more attention, I'm sure there will be people in my congregation asking my option soon enough.

I agree that many people don't understand the separation of Church and State we attempt here in the US. We must remember it's freedom of religion, not from it...

Conservative is important to me, the prez will last 4, maybe 8 years, but the appointments to the supreme court can direct the country for decades.

Abortion is my no waver issue.

I heard Fox has some kind of test you can take online to see who you match up with closest on the issues?
I will look for it next week and post a link if I can. It would be kind of interesting for all of us to take the test and see who we like on the issues alone...
Back to top
J Dan Brown
Kitten



Joined: 18 Nov 2007
Posts: 147

Location: Elm Grove, LA

PostPosted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 8:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mr. Sharring, for some reason, I tend to understand where you're going, what you're saying, and have no problem agreeing with and understanding all you state. Mr. George, forgive me, but you lose me most of the time. At times, I have trouble relating what you're saying to what we were discussing. More than likely, it's my lack of a formal education which hampers my understanding, or my thinking that debate in certain situations is mostly futile. Who knows? I am an idiot, I have been told!

All I'm sure of is that I would like a President who would stand up for the Word and Christian values and have "no empty words and no white lies, no token prayers and no compromise." Someone bold enough to say that He believes that the Bible is all true and no part of a fairy tale or some fable. I am not for someone who would play a "lesser of two evils" game and compromise on a Christian value because we have tried it before and it didn't work, so why try it now.

Sin is sin, no matter what, and Christians should react to it the same, no matter what and that is with disgust and intolerance! This goes for a Christian President, as well. I use the Living Word as my guide for everything and think a President should as well, and really don't care what anyone thinks except my Savior and His Father, as long as I strive to follow this perfect, living guide as I hope my choice for President would. I am also certainly wise enough to know that this would not be much popular, even among some "Christians" which is what I meant with his boldness about his faith frightening the average American. I am for sure it doesn't frighten me!
Blessed, by this country, regardless of the wounds She's endured and healings yet to come, Dan


Last edited by J Dan Brown on Fri Dec 28, 2007 3:30 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
George E
Big Hamster



Joined: 29 Jul 2007
Posts: 93

Location: Pittsburgh

PostPosted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 3:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

J Dan Brown wrote:
All I'm sure of is that I would like a President who would stand up for the Word and Christian values and have "no empty words and no white lies, no token prayers and no compromise." Someone bold enough to say that He believes that the Bible is all true and no part of a fairy tale or some fable. I am not for someone who would play a "lesser of two evils" game and compromise on a Christian value because we have tried it before and it didn't work, so why try it now.

Sin is sin, no matter what, and Christians should react to it the same, no matter what and that is with disgust and intolerance! This goes for a Christian President, as well. I use the Living Word as my guide for everything and think a President should as well, and really don't care what anyone thinks except my Savior and His Father, as long as I strive to follow this perfect, living guide as I hope my choice for President would. I am also certainly wise enough to know that this would not be much popular, even among some "Christians."


What scares me is a politician exercising power based on believing the "Bible is all true" who combines that believe with a tendency to "proof-text" or take individual verses or fragments of verses out of context and loses their true meaning. What scares me is a politician who subscribes to the historically recent interpretations of Revelations and who wants to "help things along" based on his misinterpretations.

The Bible is all true about the nature of God's love for mankind. That truth is often revealed through metaphor and parable. The fact that some of the metaphors and parables that reveal the truth about God didn't actually take place don't change the truth they reveal. When Jesus told the stories of the Good Samaritan or the Prodigal Son, he made those stories up. Similar events might have happened, but Jesus was simply telling a story that illustrated His point. And His point was undeniably true even if the stories told to demonstrate that point weren't.

I won't dispute that Christians should react to all sin in the proper way. I believe that means that we should react with love for the sinner even as we hate the sin, and with tolerance for the actions even as we pray that the Holy Spirit leads those who engage in sin to stop.

The one thing that separates Christianity from false religions like Islam is that we know the truth about God's view towards mankind. We know that God loves us despite our sinful condition, and that God seeks an internal change of heart that will lead us to turn away from sin. To "fight" sin by outlawing acts of sin and punishing everyone into conforming to the law is what Islam is all about. It is not what Christianity is all about.

In a perfect Islamic world, no one would sin because all sins would be illegal and everyone would be afraid of punishment. In a perfect Christian world, no one would sin because no one wanted to disappoint God.
Back to top
J Dan Brown
Kitten



Joined: 18 Nov 2007
Posts: 147

Location: Elm Grove, LA

PostPosted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 8:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

George, please forgive me for being such a poor communicator. I must be if you could interpret anything I said above to say that I believed that all the characters in Christ's parables were folks that had walked this earth. What I meant to say was that I believe God's word to be inerrant, pefect, without mistakes, not filled with secret codes and It is alive and is promised to me as a believer to be revealed to me, through much prayer and meditation on it, as I can understand it. I believe that God created everything, foretold and fulfilled a promised son, born of a virgin, died on a cross and rose and ascended to be with His Father and left the Holy Spirit and His words as our guide. He knew every moment in all our lives before He hung the stars in place. None of that is a fable or fairy tale! His Word is filled with nothing but truth, and I doubt my thoughts can be shaken on that!

I believe God to be sovereign, and hasn't allowed any mistranlations that really matter to occur. I don't believe we will ever have a President that as part of his inauguration speech says "America, Jesus loves me, He loves you too! How do I know this for sure? Because the Bible tells me so!" I think it would be great, but I don't expect it. Because most Christians in this country are too meek to stand up and be counted. I can only hope and pray that I am and act as God intended! That probably wasn't very clear either, and I am sorry.

I was once told that the interwoven three rings in the front of my "New King James" version is an ancient celtic symbol representing witches or something. It's like The original King James is all that is true. I can't accept that. I make it a point to compare all of the 5 most quoted versions to improve my understanding. Maybe that means I am stupid. Anyway I apologize for not being clear, if I wasn't. Perhaps I should offer less words and just read more and be careful that I am always understood. The old man in me wants to view some of this as a petty, argumentative, twisting of my words, but the new man can rejoice and feel loved. The old man wants to be reminded of those other guitar forums that I fled from, but the new man wants to fit in and maybe have his intelligence, faith and understanding of the big, important picture respected, if even for a tiny bit, although he is pretty ignorant. But some call me a dreamer. (heavy sigh)

Again I apologize and to all of you, please tell me instantly if I write anything inappropriate or out of line with The Living Word. I'll try to think and read more and type less, although I long to participate and share my thoughts on things. Remember, my brain occaisionally shorts out. Wink Praise the Lord! And I live in a mobile home in a cow pasture in NW Louisiana, yet are not shamed and my Father is an retired earthworm rancher, and I once ranched tropical fish and marketed fossilized wood to aquarium shops.
Blessed, by a hopeful and prayerful understanding, Dan
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    GuitarDiscussion.com Forum Index -> CHRISTIAN GUITAR LOUNGE All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 


© 2001-2007